Bryco • Jennings • Lorcin • Raven
Bryco • Jennings • Lorcin • Raven
Home Bryco Pistols Jennings Pistols
Raven Pistols
News Gallery Contact Us

Go to Forum

Bryco M59, 9 mm
Bryco M59, 9 mm

Make:  Bryco Arms 

Made: Carson City, Nevada, USA, and Costa Mesa, California, USA 

Models: Model 38, Model 380 ACP

Caliber: 9 mm 

Capacity: 6 Rounds 

Jennings Pistol

Jimenez JA9

Jennings - Silenced

Jimenez JA 380

Lorcin Pistol

J 22

Bryco Elite

History of Bryco Arms

Bryco Arms and Jennings Firearms Bryco Arms was one of the so called " Ring of Fire" manufacturers of Saturday night special firearms that operated in and around Los Angeles, California. It produced firearms variously branded as Jennings Firearms at its Irvine, California facility, as well as under the brand name of Bryco Arms at its former Carson City, Nevada facility, and at its Costa Mesa, California facility.

Bryco Arms went into bankruptcy in 2003 as a result of losing a lawsuit filed in Oakland, California which resulted in a jury award of a record $24 million judgment against it. The lawsuit stemmed from an injury to a 12-year old who was attempting to unload the 380 ACP version of the Bryco Arms Model 38 and pulled the trigger with a round still in the gun. An ensuing accidental discharge resulted in paralyzing a young boy named Brandon Maxfield. The jury ruled that the pistol had a design flaw, in that it had to have the trigger pulled to de-cock the striker, after unloading the semi-automatic pistol.

Many if not most semi-automatic pistols with external hammers utilize a similar design, which has found widespread use since early Colt Firearms first used this method around 1905. Notable among pistols which require hammer decocking is the standard US Military issue pistol for over 70 years, the Colt M1911. 

Jimenez Arms Bryco's former foreman, Paul Jimenez, bought the bankrupt Bryco Arms for $510,000 in August 2004, and renamed the company Jimenez Arms. The former Model 380 (the 380 ACP version of the Model 38) was renamed the JA-380, and production of the same semi-automatic pistol design was resumed.

In an ironic twist, the victim of the accidentalshooting, Brandon Maxfield, was a runner-up bidder for taking control of the Bryco Arms company, bidding $505,000. If he had the high bid, his plan was to melt all stockpiles of guns and gun parts at the company to make a sculpture, and to close the company, firing all of the employees. 

Bryco was purchased by Paul Jimenez and resumed operation in Costa Mesa, California under the new name of Jimenez Arms.  Jimenez Arms resumed manufacturing former Jennings Firearms and Bryco Arms models, after only changing the name and model numbers on the slides of the models. This transition was easily accomplished, simply making minor changes in the engineering drawings for the next set of slides when it came time to order more. The JA-NINE, the former Bryco Arms Model 380 (renamed the JA-380), the former Jennings J-22 (renamed the JA-22 LR), and the Jennings J-25 (renamed the JA-25 Auto) 

Allegedly, the JA-NINE 9mm handgun was prone to catastrophic failure under normal firing conditions. (If you have any proof of a catastrophic failure please email this website.As far as the owner of this site has been able to research none have been presented to a court of law). 

Lawsuits were brought forth in 2004 by the same groups that had forced Bryco Arms into bankruptcy earlier, claiming that Jimenez Arms was again selling an unsafe, inferior firearm to the public, much as had been claimed for the Bryco Arms Model 380.(Claimed but never proven in a court of law!) As a result of the negative publicity, ongoing lawsuits, and especially the fact the gun's magazine held 12 rounds (which was over the 10 round limit of the Federally-sunsetted Assault Weapons Ban which was still mandated in California), (The real reason) the California Department of Justice ordered Jimenez Arms to cease manufacturing JA-NINE pistols for sale in California on January 13, 2005, only 5 months after Jimenez Arms had been re-incarnated from Bryco Arms. Jimenez Arms was forced into bankruptcy in January 2005 much as Bryco Arms had been earlier. 

Jimenez Arms no longer produces the JA-NINE for sale in California, but has continued to produce and sell the JA-NINE, JA-380, and other product offerings to dealers physically located outside of California. Newly-manufactured JA-NINE pistols are currently available for sale to end customers throughout most of the US through Internet gun auction sites for $150-$170, and wholesale quantities are available for even less each from distributor Shining Star Investments, LLC. This inexpensive gun is the top line model sold by Jimenez Arms. Popularity, usage, and limitations The company's guns are extremely popular with pawnshops, often being the lowest-priced new handguns available. Critics, on the other hand, claim they are simply more Saturday night specials. Durability is perhaps not as good as more expensive guns, and there are also problems occasionally with the guns. However, each gun is sold with a lifetime warranty to original purchasers, such that problems, if they arise, can usually be resolved. 

The end result is that the low-cost guns are extremely popular for many, especially those in the inner cities, who often cannot afford more expensive guns for self-protection. They have been sold in quantities of many tens of millions per decade ever since 1978. Their popularity notwithstanding, they are often the hated target of those who favor gun control in the gun politics debate, primarily for being representative of the worst handguns sold, being affordable even to the poor. A good reason to buy one if for no other.

Current status Recent attempts by the company's former owners to re-establish the company in Nevada have thus far proven unsuccessful. JA officials believe the California rulings regarding the safety of the JA-NINE firearm to be false, claiming that private individuals with a vested interest (Read Brandon Maxfield's lawyer.) in a particular outcome had funded the testing, repeating the tests with numerous guns until finally finding several that failed to operate as intended, and then submitting these few guns with problems for California safety-testing. If this claim is true, it makes the gun safety tests unrepresentative at best, and malicious at worst, in the anti-gun business climate that exists in California.

Go to Forum
Go to Forum

Bryco • Jennings • Lorcin • Raven